Friday, November 2, 2018

Look Hear?

One-Two-Five (Stewart, Gouldman)
Welcome To The World (Mackay, Fenn)
How'm I Ever Gonna Say Goodbye (Gouldman, Fenn)
Don't Send We Back (Fenn)
I Took You Home (Stewart)
It Doesn't Matter At All (Stewart, Gouldman)
Dressed To Kill (Stewart, Gouldman)
Lovers Anonymous (Stewart, Gouldman)
I Hate To Eat Alone (Gouldman)
Strange Lover (Stewart, Gouldman)
L.A. Inflatable (Stewart, Gouldman)


CREDITS
One-Two-Five
Eric Stewart: Lead Vocal, Electric Guitar
Graham Gouldman: 2nd Lead Vocal, Bass, Electric Guitar
Rick Fenn: Electric Guitar
Duncan Mackay: Yamaha CS80
Paul Burgess: Drums, Percussion
Stuart Tosh: Backing Vocals
Welcome To The World
Eric Stewart: Lead Vocals, Lead Guitar, Backing Vocals
Graham Gouldman: Lead Vocal, Bass, Backing Vocal
Duncan Mackay: Yamaha CD80, Organ, Clavinet duo, Harpsichord
Rick Fenn: Lead Guitar, Electric Guitar, Backing Vocals
Paul Burgess: Drums
Stuart Tosh: Backing Vocals, Percussion
How'm I Ever Gonna Say Goodbye
Graham Gouldman: Lead Vocal, Bass Electric Guitar, Backing Vocals
Rick Fenn: Electric Guitar, 2nd Lead Vocal
Duncan Mackay: Yamaha CS80
Paul Burgess: Drums
Stuart Tosh: Backing Vocals
Eric Stewart: Out to lunch
Don't Send My Back
Rick Fenn: Lead Vocal, Electric Guitar, Acoustic Guitar
Graham Gouldman: Bass, Acoustic Guitar, Backing Vocals
Eric Stewart: Lead Guitar, Backing Vocal
Duncan Mackay: Organ, Vocoder
Paul Burgess: Drums, Marimba
Stuart Tosh: Backing Vocal, Percussion
I Took You Home
Eric Stewart: Lead Vocal, Lead Guitar, Electric Piano, Harmony Vocal, Vocoder
Graham Gouldman: Bass, Acoustic Guitar, Electric Guitar
Duncan Mackay: Yamaha CS80, Piano, Tubular Bells, Vocoder
Rick Fenn: Electric Guitar
Paul Burgess: Drums, Percussion
Stuart Tosh: Percussion
It Doesn't Matter At All
Eric Stewart: Lead Vocal, Backing Vocal, Electric Guitar
Graham Gouldman: Bass, Acoustic Guitar, Backing Vocal
Duncan Mackay: Electric Guitar, Yamaha CS80
Paul Burgess: Drums
Stuart Tosh: Backing Vocals
Rick Fenn: Electric Guitar, Backing Vocal
Dressed To Kill
Graham Gouldman: Lead Vocal. Bass, Electric Guitar, Backing Vocals
Eric Stewart: Electric Guitar, Slide Lead Guitar, Maracas
Rick Fenn: Electric Guitar
Duncan Mackay: Organ, Clavinet Duo
Paul Burgess: Drums
Stuart Tosh: Backing Vocal
Lovers Anonymous
Eric Stewart: Lead Vocal, Lead Guitar
Graham Gouldman: Bass, Acoustic guitar, Backing Vocal, Electric Guitar
Rick Fenn: Lead Guitar, Backing Vocal
Duncan Mackay: Yamaha CS80, Tubular Bells, Piano
Paul Burgess: Drums
Stuart Tosh: Backing Vocal, Timpani, Percussion
I Hate To Eat Alone
Graham Gouldman: Lead Vocal, Bass, Acoustic Guitar, Electric Guitar, Congas
Eric Stewart: Percussion
Rick Fenn: Lead Guitar, Electric Guitar, Backing Vocal
Duncan Mackay: Yamaha CS80, Electric Piano
Paul Burgess: Drums
Stuart Tosh: Backing Vocal
Strange Lover
Eric Stewart: Lead Vocal, Electric Guitar, Electric Piano, Backing Vocal
Graham Gouldman: Bass, Electric Guitar, Backing Vocals
Duncan Mackay: Organ, Piano, Backing Vocal
Rick Fenn: Electric Guitar, Backing Vocal
Stuart Tosh: Backing Vocal
Paul Burgess: Drums, Timpani, Percussion
L.A. Inflatable
Eric Stewart: Lead Vocal, Slide Lead Guitar, Backing Vocal, Electric Piano
Graham Gouldman: Bass, Electric Guitar, Backing Vocal
Rick Fenn: Lead Guitar, Backing Vocal
Duncan Mackay: Piano, Yamaha CS80, Organ
Paul Burgess: Drums
Stuart Tosh: Backing Vocal



Here is the story behind the album from 1980:

“Change your line of patter, make her laugh not at her” “You’re through gestation so welcome to the world, we’ve still got vacancies just waiting to be filled...” “The starving of the multitudes and feeding of the few, we’re only human and there’s nothing we can do, you must do something or we’ll all go up in smoke – we’d like to help you but we’re scared of losing votes” “We’re not progressing, we’re only marking time, you’re on your own, think of your children, they’re only children, but are they welcome to the world?” “You’ve been hanging on to a dream, hoping that time would turn your fear away, but you must stop, take a look around, what do you see? Do you see me?” “You’re living in a world where reason is a waste of time, nobody talking, the atmosphere is cold, touching you deeply, way down inside you, do you wanna be loved?” “Put your image in your pocket, hang your collar in the closet” “It’s easy to drink when nobody’s home, and I hate to eat alone” “When you’ve got TV on the table and TV on TV, all you do is chew your finger down to the bone” “They say the city’s rotten to the core, there’s no communication with each other any more, but we stopped talking to each other a long time before” “I’m lost I’m lost I’m lost I’m lost I’m lost I’m lost I’m lost I’m lost I’m lost I’m lost I’m lost I’m lost I’m looooooooooooooooooooost!” “The meaning be-=lying on her face made me look a little closer between n the lines” “L.A. smiles to hide the frown, L.A. promises to follow you down, L.A. teeth and L.A. hair, L.A. curves that shouldn’t be there”
10CC “LOOK, HEAR, ARE YOU NORMAL?” (1980) One Two Five/Welcome To The World/How’m I Ever Going To Say Goodbye?/Don’t Send We Back/I Took You Home//It Doesn’t Matter At All/Dressed To Kill/Lovers Anonymous/I Hate To Eat Alone/Strange Lover/L.A. Inflatable
Even as recently as 1979, taking a ‘year out’ just wasn’t an option for mainstream bands who wanted to sell records. That sounds daft to modern ears I know – Adele’s next record will be titled ‘35’ by the time she’s brought up a baby and sales of her last album ‘21’ have properly died down – but that’s how it was back then, whatever the reason, however frustrating the cause. For many casual 10cc fans the lack of an album and – for the first time ever – hit single was a good excuse to stop caring, to say that the band had been giving a case of ‘diminishing returns’ since Godley and Creme split from the band suddenly in 1976 and that it was 10cc, not Pink Floyd, who were the real antithesis of punk rock and new wave, with all their production values, clever lyrics and quirky nonsense. And so another mighty band fell from favor, dropping out the charts quicker than you can say ‘Dreadlock Holiday’, with the first in a trilogy of ‘flop’ albums that have been ignored for far too long. Had Eric Stewart not had that awful car accident in 1979 – one that left him unable to play the guitar for quite a few months and forced a hiatus within the band – we might not have had the final pair of 10cc albums ‘Ten Out of Ten’ and ‘Windows In The Jungle’, thought-provoking, fascinating albums from a man whose fighting his way back from death and suddenly has a big announcement for us all, even if no one is listening anymore (both of these records are part of our ‘core’ 101 classic album reviews). ‘Look Hear’ isn’t an album up to those two – and its not even up to the quirky, nonsense-loving albums that came out before (hit albums ‘Bloody Tourists’ and ‘Deceptive Bends’) so its no wonder that fans forget about it. The sound of a band laughing in a fading replica of what came before and trying to ignore the massive changes that are taking place, ‘Look Hear’ is one of those albums that tries so hard to be like everything that came before that it doesn’t really have an identity of its own. But it’s not its fault. Given the circumstances its a wonder that the album manages to be even this good.
Because parts of it are good, if not quite great. Understandably, Eric Stewart’s not quite right yet. While he’ll be back on top form for ‘Ten Out Of Ten’ (his first album to address the very major changes in life perspective he’s just been through), for this album he’s still finding his feet and chuckling slightly more awkwardly and less sincerely in his songs than before. Of his songs for the album only the bizarre and faintly threatening ‘Strange Lover’ hints at the inner turbulence that must have been going through his mind (and will be heard properly on the next two 10cc albums) even if all the pieces aren’t quite there yet and the most traditional song on the album (co-written with Gouldmann) ‘It Doesn’t Matter At All’, the heartfelt single from this album that really deserved to be a hit record, despite being less hook-driven or quirky than any past release. Elsewhere, though, Eric sounds lost and like a funnyman trying to go back on stage to crack jokes before he’s quite ready, not realizing that the jokes were funny more from the way he was telling them than from the content of the jokes themselves. A song like ‘L.A. Inflatable’, for instance, is an easy target by 10cc standards (the recent craze for beauty surgery) and ‘I Took You Home’ is the by-now traditional Eric Stewart torch ballad, only this one is so mild and so insincerely felt it sounds more like a match.
When your band is well known for having four singer-songwriters you can afford for one to have an ‘off album’, but now that Eric and Gouldmann are the only members of the band that people in the street can point to that’s a problem. For Graham, however, it’s the opposite story: the sudden overnight success of ‘Dreadlock Holiday’ (credited to both men, but more Graham’s baby than Eric’s) has given him new confidence and at last he’s stepped out of the shadows of the other, louder band members to offer his own voice of self-deprecating humor and a musical shrug of the shoulders. Gouldmann writes or co-writes eight songs on this album which is a record and a far cry from the days of the first two 10cc albums when he was lucky to get two. What’s more he sings lead on almost all of these songs too, instead of giving them to Eric to sing with his more naturally radio-friendly voice or the new members to sing. At long last, Gouldmann is an equal partner in a band that he was last to join in 1972 (after the other three bonded as ‘Hotlegs’) and often seemed to be overshadowed in, despite having the best pedigree of making hits of any of the four original members of the band. For my money, Gouldmann’s songs on these last three ‘forgotten’ albums are up to anything in his career (including the big hits he wrote for The Hollies and The Yardbirds et al) and are the ‘stepping stone’ between the often brutally funny 10cc songs and his more commercial work in ‘Wax’ in the 1980s. It’s an awful shame in retrospect that the break came just when Graham had finally proved himself a full ‘partner’ with ‘Dreadlock Holiday’ but the break did him good – while not all his songs on this album are winners (and the band recycle their loose reggae-ish rhythms a bit too often for comfort) they do show a new-found fire and pizzazz missing from a lot of his earlier work.
For only the second and last time 10cc are a six-piece studio band in this period too. After travelling the world in a highly successful world tour (captured on the live record ‘Live and Let Live’ in 1978) 10cc are far more of a ‘band’ here than they were on ‘Bloody Tourists’ – and again it’s unfortunate that the year’s break and poor sales of this album means 10cc simply can’t sustain this line-up in the long term. Poker-faced Rick Fenn is a gift for the band, with his deep daft bass vocals and his sterling guitar work and during the year’s gap he’s been busy, actually writing the best (and most 10cc-ish) material on the album. ‘Welcome To The World’ (co-written with keyboardist Duncan O’Malley) is semi-famous in fan circles for being one of the only songs not to be written by Eric or Graham (or Kevin or Lol on earlier albums). Put a fan through a ‘blind’ test, though, and they’d probably conclude this scary song about a baby being born into an uncaring, unwelcoming world and being ushered on by a bunch of juddery, relentless synth beats is the logical progression from such tongue-in-cheek songs as ‘Rock and Roll Lullaby’ (‘It’s daybreak in the land of nod, so go to sleep you little sod!’) and ‘I Wanna Rule The World’ (where megalomaniacs rule and the world seems to be upside down). Fenn’s other song of immigration hassles (‘Don’t Send We Back’) gets laughed at now for its faintly ludicrous patois and patronizing accent but this, too, sounds more like the old band (and a sequel to his we’re-all-one-really cold war protest song ‘Reds In My Bed’). Just as Eric and Graham are moving on for various reasons, so Fenn is enough of a 10cc fan to offer up a reminder of the old sound.
The other band members are less vocal, but still key to the sound. While drummer Paul Burgess carries on to the end (albeit without his face on the cover and in smaller typing credits than Eric or Graham), percussionist Stuart Tosh and keyboardist Duncan O’Malley also take their last bows here. That’s a shame because whatever you think about the songs these last three albums undoubtedly sound better than most 10cc recordings, with a double drum attack that gives the band’s quirkier songs a more powerful edge and an electronic hubbub of noise that might be the most dated thing on the record now but was genuinely pioneering and contemporary at the time (indeed, the rest of the world won’t catch up with O’Malley’s work for some year yet). The four band members’ patience and belief in the band where they waited for Eric to recover from his accident seems to have been poorly rewarded and if a lot of these songs seem to be 10cc-by-numbers that’s not the fault of the band members who give their all right to the very end.
If there’s a theme on this album, it’s one of the world letting you down and of things not being how they ought to be. There’s no ranting, or raving (like there would be on a Pink Floyd or John Lennon record), but a feeling that from your birth (‘Welcome To The World’) to your adulthood, someone always wants a piece of you and something about the freedom they promised you that you would have isn’t quite right. ‘125’ is about the strange, curious mating rituals of human beings on the dancefloor, with the narrator’s conscience reminding him that if he must act he should act like someone sensitive and kind (‘Change your style of patter, make her laugh – not at her’. ‘How’m I Ever Going To Say Goodbye?’ tells the story in reverse, a ‘Dear John’ letter with a reggae-ish lilt where the rather serious and airs-and-graces-filled verses give way to a sudden outpouring of real emotion the narrator could never say to his beloved’s face. ‘Don’t Send We Back’ is a group of immigrants searching for refuge but being told by a cold, heartless country to go back home – where they’ll all probably die through no fault of their own (they have to go somewhere after all - something UKIP always forgets to mention during their political diatribes). ‘It Doesn’t Matter At All’ is written as a love song between a husband comforting his wife but might well be Eric’s ‘return’ song, Graham’s lyric saying that ‘it doesn’t matter at all’ what happens on his return as long as his friend is alright (if so – and it’s only speculation - no wonder it sounds like the one heartfelt song on the album). ‘Dressed To Kill’ returns to the theme of ‘125’, a hip young wannabe staring in the mirror and willing himself to be the cool young dude he looks like in his head. ‘I Hate To Eat Alone’ is the sound of a narrator getting fed up with his own small world with no one to share it with, triggered by the realization that he has no one else to cook for when he stumbles home alone (along with ‘Lifeline’ from ‘Bloody Tourists’ it could also be a song about the loneliness of touring). ‘Strange Lover’ is one of those Eric Stewart songs that have an older woman trying to make a man of the hapless narrator and who changes his world forever (one look in your eyes and I’mlostI’mlostI’mlostyI’mlostI’mlost I’mlostI’mlostyI’mlostI’mloooooooooooooooooooo oooooooooooooooooooooooooooost’ howls the song’s fade in a belated show of emotion). And finally, we get the most 10cc-ish song on the theme: ‘L.A. Inflatable’ where everyone has had plastic surgery to look the same and everyone looks like an alien. This is a world where things have been taken to extremes and no one knows what to make of the world anymore – where nothing is heartfelt and people have stopped to talking to each other and acting like themselves. Viewed like this, as a kind of vague concept album, the record makes a bit more sense.
There’s no getting round the elephant in the room, however: ‘Look, Hear’ is less focused, more unsure and less funny than any previous 10cc albums, without actually being as gritty or as impressively complex as ‘Ten Out Of Ten’ or ‘Windows In The Jungle’. Most fans call this album ‘average’ – but in my eyes its worse than that: along with perhaps ‘Deceptive Bends’ this is perhaps the weakest of the band’s run and just about the only one of the original albums I wouldn’t recommend to someone whose never heard of the band (the two reunion albums, however, are far worse). It’s not that its bad, just bland, as if the memory of what made the band great is only a distant memory and doesn’t come as naturally, with the slight change in direction only showing itself in flashes, not whole songs (‘Strange Lover’ being a musical if not lyrical hint at the dark edges to come which throws all that passion away on yet another song about a mysterious woman and ‘I Hate To Eat Alone’ possessing perhaps Gouldmann’s sombrest lyric about isolation, albeit with a chirpy melody that seems to make light of the song).
The trouble I have as a reviewer is in pointing out things that even the band must have known were wrong, but were powerless to correct. The three returns to reggae are embarrassing, completely the wrong sound for 1980 (after the band got lucky in stumbling across ‘the’ sound of 1978) but understandable, given that it was the band’s last ‘hit’ sound (and, indeed, these songs may well have been written in 1978 for all I know). The music often seems humdrum, faintly like something you’ve heard before instead of grabbing you by the ears and dancing, as so many past 10cc albums do – which is what writers tend to do after a gap away when they know they have to win their old audience back again. The lyrics, too, are without their usual twists and turns, stings-in-the-tale or ‘did I really just hear that?’ moments while you scramble to the lyric sheet to see what clever pun the band have got past the censors this time. Again, this is exactly what you’d expect from a band who are following up a hit album but after time away – they don’t want to scare off new fans or put off old ones. Unfortunately, this means they end up pleasing nobody, with songs too bland for the new fans who loved ‘Dreadlock Holiday’ and ‘Tourists’ in general and the old guard who think it a written agreement that 10cc songs should offer more layers and puns per minute than anything by anybody else. It must be reiterated though: nothing on this album is bad, the playing is top-notch throughout and the band continue to fly through more styles per album than most bands own records – it’s just that, by 10cc standards, it’s bland. You can listen to this album continuously for days and only pick out one or two tunes by the end of it – usually you can pick out three or four tunes per song so something is clearly wrong.
Sadly, no wonder it didn’t sell. There’s simply nothing here the general public hadn’t heard before and 10cc didn’t have the following to become just another well drilled pack of rock and rollers releasing albums in this album, not with a year away anyway. Still I wonder why this album has been quite as trashed as it is: it’s certainly not so bad you’d hate it (as many fans seem to do), there’s no debate-making thought-provoking attacks here and actually less insincere sludge than some other 10cc albums I could name (like ‘Deceptive Bends’ or even ‘Bloody Tourists’). The sheep in the room, meanwhile, is on the album cover – where a lamb sits on a psychiatrist’s couch under the accusing banner ‘LOOK HEAR!’ (a very 10cc pun). The wording underneath reads in tiny letters ‘are you normal?’ Hipgnosis (in case you hadn’t guessed) were behind the very zany cover and have clearly been listening to a lot of 10cc’s records because this sort of soul-questioning, do-I-have-a-right-to-be-zany? humor is highly in keeping for almost every 10cc record. The idea of a sheep (typically an animal that’s meant to do as its told) asking for psychiatric help because he thinks he’s not like everybody else should be spot on the money (and may well be Hipgnosis’ witty response to being told what to do by Roger Waters for the first time on the cover of Pink Floyd’s ‘Animals’ which includes a song called ‘Sheep’) and it shows up how unusual this record is that it doesn’t quite fit. ‘Look Hear’ is a timid, uncomfortable record – it should be this album’s artwork peeking through a slot in the record sleeve (a la ‘Windows In The Jungle’), not proudly declaiming to the world ‘we’re weird and we don’t care!!!!’ Original vinyl copies come with a poster of the album cover, which was stuck on my wall for a time (and got some very interesting looks from my friends and relatives) which only made the matter worse somehow. Look, hear, this album is normal – that’s the main problem with it.
All ‘Look Hear’ really needs is a couple of hit songs (‘125’ came the closest from this album and even that didn’t chart), slightly more quirky ideas and a sense of that somber, mocking humor that Eric Stewart will come to write in the next four years as he tries to come to terms with the fact that, by rights, he should be dead (it was one heck of an accident) and what does he want to do with his life now he’s got a second chance? Change those things around and 10cc might have managed to overcome the ‘hole’ a year away represents in any band’s discography. They would then have lasted as a sextet band, traveled the world again even more successfully than the last time and recorded side-splitting but deeper, darker albums way into the 1980s. Instead this album already feels like a winding down and you can feel the elements of the band’s two less than stellar reunion albums ‘Meanwhile’ and ‘Mirror Mirror’ in this album’s DNA, bland records made simply because the band still had a couple of albums to go on their contract and they were made to release them by the record company, or else. Thankfully the band aren’t quite that cynical or working under such duress just yet. Instead though what we have is an album that only intermittently catches fire, only occasionally makes us laugh and only infrequently tugs at our heart strings, which from a band who made us laugh, grimace and cry more than almost any other in the 1970s is quite a come down and inevitably ushered in a sequence of events that left the band dried up and over. The shock is that not one song out of the eleven on this album shines through – and as we’ve already seen the closest song to doing that isn’t by Eric or Graham at all but from a guitarist on only his second and sadly last album, desperate to keep the band in touch with their more progressive past. Thank goodness Eric didn’t lose his life in that awful car crash – but by having it he kicked in a series of events that effectively scuppered the band he and Graham had co-founded and pushed to acclaim and success, which had to downsize greatly a matter of months afterwards. Who’d have thought taking a year out would have such far-reaching consequences?
‘125’ is a surprisingly gruff and macho beginning that suggest the band had been listening to a lot of disco records, with an unexpected middle eight of pure reggae for good measure. 10cc wrote many songs about dancefloors over the years, perhaps because it is a place where people try and ‘pull’ another human being by acting wholly out of character and being an extension of who they want to be, not who they are. There’s usually a sticky ending, too, although that doesn’t really come in this track which simply has the narrator promising empty romantic platitudes. The narrator is nervous and edgy, though, his conscience trying to remind him to behave, basically, and treat her girl like a human being in a marvelous counterpoint melody sung by Gouldmann that rattles away in his ear as if he’s being controlled by a robot. Eric’s vocal ranges from nervous to energized throughout the song, finally hitting an unexpected crescendo in the middle where everything comes right, the rather awkward tempo finally clicks and Stewart simply soars into the heavens as only he can. You have to say, though, this is a great-sounding song where nothing much happens: Stewart’s garbled but witty spoken word patter throughout the song is hilarious (‘We can go on a ride, we can jump in a boat, we can dance by the light of the moon’) but somehow doesn’t get anywhere. There’s no great insight to this song, no real twist and however beautiful it sounds when you’re listening to it when you dig a bit deeper you realize the story of some nit on the dancefloor and the band chanting ‘reggae reggae reggae R_E_G_G_A_E’ isn’t really going to cut it alongside past classic (not least because reggae never really made it to the dancefloor – had the band been chanting ‘disco’ this song might have made more sense). You have to say, though, the sound of this recording is great – Fenn and Stewart’s twin guitars, largely playing a single note, sound superb, the double percussion driving force of Burgess and Tosh never sounds as right again as it does here and Eric’s vocal is terrific, as if the band have never been away and nothing has ever been wrong. I’d hate to put seething this flimsy up the with the very best of 10c’s work, but a terrific band performance is so strong it more than rescues a rather so-so song.
‘Welcome To The World’ is another little nugget of genius, Fenn’s caring, empathetic words matched with O’Malley’s churning, almost ugly synth beats for a track that’s both the most 10cc-ish on the album (questioning the act of bringing children into a world that’s already full and unlikely to care much for them – for all the laughs 10cc songs quite often deal with subjects like this) and the most contemporary, sounding more like Heaven 17 or The Human League before they brought in waitresses into the group. Eric and Graham alternate vocals, the latter sounding unusually uncomfortable though the former seems to be having great fun, on a song that alternates being seriously concerned with the welfare of all the new born babies that year in a world full of cold war, chaos and angst (‘Think of the children! They’re only children!’) and in-jokes (‘We’ll send them packing on a dreadlock holiday’). Two factors bring this song up above the average: Gouldmann’s wonderfully manic, eccentric bass guitar playing which is closer to jazz or funk than pop and a mournful, reflective middle eight where the band get their breath back and Fenn plays a lovely, lilting guitar lick. A clever, comical but deep song about over-population and the hopelessness at most people of changing it (‘we’re only humanoid, there’s nothing we can do!’ sings Gouldmann in mock horror at one point, while a politician is dismissed with the line ‘we’d like to help but we’re afraid of losing votes!’), this is one of the album highlights and one of the few songs from this album worth digging out if you’re a big fan.
‘How’m I Ever Going To Say Goodbye?’ is, alas, another lazy song. Co-written by Fenn and Gouldmann, I’d love to know who wrote which part because the contrast between insincere, apologetic letter-writing and sudden bursts of true emotion hidden between the lines is huge. Frankly, the letter writing is awful, cod-reggae from a band who seem to have forgotten how to play it and Gouldmann’s ideas of a Jamaican accent is the worst since Richard Madeley tried to do Ali G, while the twee Carribean-drumming is so bad Bob Marley must have been killing himself with laughter if he ever heard it. The second part, though, where the narrator admits that the worry of saying goodbye to his loved one has got him ‘drinking ‘smoking’ sinking’ and ‘choking’ before flowering into a gorgeous peal of harmonies is actually pretty good. A second or even third or fourth reggae song after ‘Dreadlock Holiday’ was sadly inevitable, but without the tongue-in-cheek spirit to carry the song off 10cc just sound like a white band feebly trying to sound black and failing badly. The worst thing is, there’s no reason for this to be a reggae song at all – had the band simply put another pop melody in place this song would have worked far better and, indeed, the instrumental middle section (where twin O’Malleys whirl around each other to great effect) might well be the most beautiful passage on the album. Some interest at least comes from the lyrics, which might (or might not) be about Eric’s accident and the problems this causes within the band. Gouldmann’s lyric about ‘changing my mind’ every few minutes sounds ‘real’, however tongue-in-cheek the delivery is, and the chorus worry about ‘how’m I ever going to go to sleep at night?’ is all too believable for a member of a band that might not exist any more. If my speculation is right, however, then Stewart deserved better than a bandmate asking ‘what are you going to do in the morning when I’m gone?’ and some awful cod-reggae. A mixed song to say the least.
‘Don’t Send We Back’ is the heaviest, hardest song on the album and features the long overdue return of Stewart’s ‘snarling’ guitar (last heard on ‘Blackmail’ and ‘Second Sitting For The Last Supper’). Fenn’s song about immigrants is a natural extension of his handful of other songs, giving voice to a minority without power that no one else will hear and musically this song does a good job at summing up their doomed journey across a cruel sea only to be sent packing again. Unfortunately Fenn’s lyrics don’t always live up to the music, the ‘we’ patois in the title is borderline offensive (at least it is now – it probably wasn’t in 1980) and the song’s good heart is undone by some pretty poor couplets that sound more like a travelogue (‘We crossed Malaysian waters, we sailed the South China sea, we stopped at Singapore and Jakarta, and you want to send we back to sea?’) Fans dismiss this song as politically ‘naive’ – which it is, but that’s not always a bad thing (certainly I’d rather a song was naive than nasty). The problem is rather that the songwriting is a little naive – rhymes that should be there but aren’t, that use of ‘we’ in the title and a chorus that ends rather dramatically ‘we won’t last the morning in the baking sun!’ Fenn is also far from a natural vocalist too and although he clearly ‘feels’ this song and the band were right to let him sing it, this is a song not really built for easy listening. That’s a shame because the sentiments are spot on (how can immigrants be both ‘taking our jobs’ and ‘living a life of luxury on benefits’ all at the same time? And if they don’t come ‘here’ – wherever here is - and can’t stay ‘there’ for fear of oppression then where are people expected to go?) and a song like this needed to be made. Musically, at least, this is the song – Stewart’s angry guitar bursts and the double drum attack are both powerful and suitable for this song’s stomach-churning riff and confusion and chaos, it’s just a shame about some of the words. A near miss.
‘I Took You Home’ is Eric Stewart’s ballad showcase for the album, which starts off promisingly with a lovely opening and a strong first line (‘I looked at your face and somehow I knew nothing could tear me away!’) but fizzles out from then on (ending the second verse with the rather lame ‘Isn’t it funny how it started? Well, you know...’) Eric’s memory of his first night of love, sheepishly in his girl’s bedrooms while her parents are sleep upstairs, is clearly heartfelt (and inspires another great guitar solo) and special to him, but doesn’t really have much going for the listener. Alas, this is one song where the band’s performance doesn’t rescue the song, which goes downhill rapidly when they all kick in (Eric should have done this one alone) and features some truly awful ‘bells’ (thankfully hidden deep in the mix) which make this song sound more like Wham than 10cc. There’s no resolution to this song, either, which sits out the second half with an instrumental and then simply fades – another verse about how the pair in the present day are still together/haven’t spoken in 20 years/are still living downstairs from the parents-in-law would have made all the difference; instead this is a frozen moment in time which isn’t explained except with a shrug of the shoulders and a ‘well...you know’. It’s as if Eric is afraid to let on just how much this experience means to him, which is fair enough (songwriters don’t have to reveal everything after all) but giving us that opening and then telling us ‘ok, that’s all you’re getting’ seems like an odd policy to me. Also, simple as this song is, there’s still room for confusion: in the first verse we’re at ‘her’ house (whoever ‘her’ might be), but the chorus (and title) clearly state ‘I took you home’ before adding meekly ‘you took me in’. Is this two separate incidents then? If so, which part happens which time? Still, a likable song - if only for the introduction – which Eric was born to sing and which is a much more natural and ‘normal’ reaction to love than some of his other songs (this album’s ‘Strange Lover’ among them) which reaches quite a remarkable climax (in more ways than one) in the middle.
‘It Doesn’t Matter At All’ is one of the album highlights. A late choice as a second single, it died a death which is a great shame because while perhaps not as inventive or original as some of the band’s best biggest hits it features one of their loveliest melodies. A sort of ‘I’m Not In Love’ from the other perspective, this is someone deep in love trying to get his loved one to admit that she is too and that it’s the rest of the world who should be ignorant of their love. People call the narrator ‘crazy’ and ‘a fool’ for being in love, but that ‘doesn’t matter at all’ if she loves him too. The hint is that the narrator is being mocked for being overly-emotional and OTT in admitting his feelings (in contrast to the in-denial narrator of ‘Love’ who makes up excuses for his signs of affection) and – in the third verse – that this might be a one-way uncomfortable relationship, with the narrator a stalker (‘Hey I’ve been talked about the way I’ve been following you – but I don’t give a damn when it feels so right!’) Eric Stewart proves again that he’s one of the best pop singers of the day with a great vocal full of love and honey, the arrangement is subtle (with O’Malley’s muted, mournful sounding synthesizer part particularly spot-on) and there are more hooks in this one song than on the rest of the album. Of course, we’ve heard this sort of song lots of times before over the years and there isn’t the usual 10cc intellectual twist going on here – but arguably this song sounds better for not having one, adding a touch of emotion to an album that badly needs it. Lyrically, too, this is nothing special but it does its job and there’s a particularly strong second verse where the narrator says thinking without feeling is simply stupid (‘You’re living in a world where reason is a waste of time, nobody talking, the atmosphere cold!’) A likeable song – whatever the narrator’s motives really are – this song’s quiet, humble melody and appealing sounds should have made the song a much bigger hit than it was. Sadly it’s the only song from this whole album to be re-issued as part of the band’s ‘Tenology’ box set in 2012 – although at least its one of the best things here.
‘Dressed To Kill’ is another of this record’s weaker songs salvaged by a great band performance. Chiefly written by Gouldmann, it’s a finger-snapping rhythmical record that again features a ‘dancefloor’ and a hip young teen trying to get ready for his big night out and convincing himself that he’s a bigger shot than he really is. Musically, it’s very similar to previous LP ‘Bloody Tourists’s ‘Anonymous Alcholic’ (albeit played less for laughs), with the same dynamic, almost disco-ish sounds and a performance that, by past 10cc standards, is downright funky. The band have finally realized how to use their two drummers (Tosh and Burgess slightly out of synch pounding their drums in the intro, which gives this song a dangerous, slightly out of control air) and Fenn and Stewart’s twin guitar attack is impressive. Sadly, though, this song is much weaker than it sounds with some pretty banal lyrics that even spoken by a wannabe young teen seem pretty weak (‘Drink in all that funky stuff, drink it in till you get enough!’) There’s a rather twee nine note riff that sounds like it belongs in another song too, a retro rockabilly hook that seems to come from a quieter, more innocent age (even though, arguably, being a teen in the 1950s was twice as scary as in the 1980s). The song gets downright unpleasant by the last verse, too, when the narrator ‘steals’ a girl from someone else and the song hints that he deserves it for being as wet blanket (‘sitting in the corner, like little Jack Horner, make him break, take his cake, he’s going to be your fool tonight!’) – frankly if this is how dancing make people behave, even in jest, then I’m sticking with the geriatric ‘Sacro-iliac’ from the 10cc’s second LP! Mind you, the girl sounds like she deserves what she gets, described here as ‘a devil with an angel’s face’. Gouldmann sounds surprisingly convincing as an angry young teen even though (or perhaps because) he couldn’t have been less like this as a youngster and 10cc do a good job at having a go at an entirely new sound – it’s just a shame that the song itself is so weak and what we have is so uncharitable.
‘Lovers Anonymous’ takes that rockabilly element to the fore and sounds very like ‘Take These Chains’ from ‘Bloody Tourists’. It sounds very much like 10cc too, with its tale of a desperate young lover calling into a dating agency – only, this being 10cc, it sounds as if the ‘doctor’ of the song is actually a psychiatrist at a sex-help clinic, ready to ‘throw a line’ to any patients suffering. A very 10cc subject matter then (taking an existing exaggeration of a human condition to its extremes), but the song doesn’t make the most of the subject matter (perhaps worrying about censorship, although that probably wouldn’t stop the band who came up with ‘Head Room’ in 1976, a song that opens eyes and ears even now). In actual fact, this song is a little bit too 10cc-ish, with pretty much the same tune and words you’d expect if you’ve been following the band’s career from ‘Donna’ on through to ‘Dreadlock Holiday’. For the most part the song rattles along unnoticed, but two things do stick out – another wonderfully gritty Eric Stewart guitar part (which sadly only really flies on the fade-out) and a curious choral middle eight, reached by such booming synths and percussion that it sounds like some grand exotic film. This aside, this is a silly, half-hearted song that’s only here really as filler and not a patch on the band’s previous dating song ‘Marriage Bureau Rendezvous’. Gouldmann’s ‘I Hate To Eat Alone’ is pretty ordinary too, sadly, an acoustic reflective ballad at one with his other, similar songs on the last few 10cc albums without the burning heartfeltness of ‘Lifeline’ or anything in the melody to make it stand out. All that said, this is still quite a sweet song about isolation and loneliness that does ring partly true (‘When you’ve got the TV on the table and TV on TV’ is a line surely borne out of personal experience) and it makes sense as a kind of sequel to ‘Lifeline’ (surely, this is another song about the emptiness of touring and being away from home?) There’s an intriguing postmodern lyrical twist too where the narrator realizes he’s a character in a story, ‘stumbling through this story line’ and quite a deep ending where the narrator reflects that ‘nobody’s guilty’ for his isolation, it’s just that ‘I didn’t tell you I had to change – you just took it for granted that we’d remain the same’. By the sound of it the couple have been drifting apart for some time but are part of a wider problem where ‘nobody ever talks anymore’. Gouldmann will later re-write this song with the excellent ‘Don’t Ask’, the opener from next album ‘Ten Out Of Ten’, although here the narrator is fine until he has to sleep alone at night, not eat. A fair middling track, sadly its scuppered by the sheer absence of any real melody and a curious mix that leaves Gouldmann’s vocal so far in the background it’s hard to hear. Read it as a poem, though, and ‘I Hate To Eat Alone’ is quite affecting. Curiously fans seem to have a real love/hate relationship with this rather anonymous song – the ‘Amazon’ review of this album, for instance, almost all select this song as ‘best or ‘worst’ on the album. Personally I’d place it somewhere in the middle – bland and forgettable, but with some very good ideas.
‘Strange Lover’ divides quite a few fans too, but I personally like it – it’s a sort-of sequel to ‘Exclamation Marks’ from ‘Bloody Tourists’ (yet another song that’s a repeat of an earlier one from that hit record – like we said earlier, surely the band listened to ‘Tourists’s lots after their year away to see where they’d got to?) , but again not quite as good. Still, Stewart’s hapless out-of-their-depth narrators are always well drawn and believable and this song about a ‘strange lover’ is winningly epic and surreal (and so different to the sweeter, more earthly romance in ‘I Took You Home’. A sort of 1980s ‘Acid Queen’, this mysterious woman has ‘no shadow’ and is ‘pale at the moon’, with ‘no complexion’ only appearing ‘at night’. Now those awful Twilight films have made vampires cool again most fans will probably jump to the vampirish conclusion pretty quickly, but at the time most fans assumed the mysterious night figure was a prostitute from the way Eric cleverly delays the twist till the end. Just to make the point clear, the music goes all Hammer Horror at the end, with a marvelously spooky organ part from O’Malley and a scary ending where lots of electronically treated Erics scream ‘I’m lost I’m lost I’m lost I’m losssssssssssssssst!’ while the tape speeds up behind him. The song is certainly striking, especially when set into the middle of this album, although the more straightforward beginning is pretty good too, Gouldmann’s ‘nagging’ harmony vocal entering into a great cat-and-mouse call-and-answer with Stewart’s, a great partnership the band should have exploited more. Admittedly, this sort of thing is far less subtlety done than on past 10cc epics (even ‘Exclamation Marks’ is a little bit cooler about events than this) and the stop-start melody is beginning to get irritating by the end. However ‘Strange Lover’ shows exactly the sort of daring and verve we’ve been kicking the rest of ‘Look, Hear’ for not showing and to my ears at least is a welcome addition to the album.
The record then undoes much of that song’s good work by ending with ‘L.A. Inflatable’, another less than memorable piece that’s a bit of anticlimax and again sounds uncomfortably close to past 10cc songs. The general theme of the song is plastic surgery and whether having it done makes you any less of a human being – the narrator certainly thinks so, double-taking more at the un-natural and un-womanly L.A. curves ‘that really shouldn’t be there’ than he did at people’s ugliness. There are some good phrases here, such as the first verse’s suggestion that the woman is just too young and cute to be true, leading the narrator to ‘look a little closer’ and see all the imperfections he normally wouldn’t, the lack of lines on her face ‘belying her face’ (note the pun on ‘lying’ – very 10cc, on an album strangely bereft of bad puns!) The song moves on to dissect the Los Angeles lifestyle as well as the looks, empty days ‘being seen’ having fun with famous people without actually having fun at all, ‘a product of rock and roll living, a victim of Hollywood hate’ who can’t think for herself. Again a strong band performance rescues a so-so song, although I’d have liked it better still without all the overdubs – Burgess’ drumming and one of Eric’s best and grittiest vocals are magnificently raw and earthy (and might well have been the original take before everything else was added) and it seems rather a shame to have all those keyboards, bass and percussion on top. The album then ends on rather a twee free-for-all solo from the whole band taking it in turns to rock out which sounds like something a less inventive 70s rock outfit would do (lots of Elton John and Rod Stewart records end this way, for instance).
‘Look Hear’ isn’t the greatest LP 10cc ever made – in fact it’s one of the worst. But it’s says much for this band’s energy, commitment and style that a record as good as this is as bad as it got after 11 years together (with an album every year except that awful time in 1979). Fans expecting Eric Stewart to address his life-changing incident head-on would be disappointed (although just wait for what happens on the superb ‘Windows In The Jungle’ especially...) and fans expecting the band to have moved on during their year away were probably less than overwhelmed too. Certainly there’s an awful lot of recycling of ideas from ‘Bloody Tourists’ here, although as much of it is being done by a band now nervous and unsure of themselves after their time away instead of a band who’d finally recovered from the massive split of 1976 (when Godley and Creme suddenly left the band) instead of one on top of the world, it sounds like the work of a completely different group. The writing is clearly on the wall – and poor sales of this record did mean that half the band have gone by the time of the next year’s LP – but the wonder, really is that this album isn’t worse given the year away, the problems making it and the very real threat that the band might not be around to even make this LP. For years this album was unavailable on CD (in fact it took until 2008, making this one of the very final AAA albums to be re-issued on compact disc) and the humdrum so-so period reviews put many fans off buying it even then. Here’s our advice: don’t start here (buy ‘Sheet Music’ ‘Original Soundtrack’ or ‘Bloody Tourists’ – we would say ‘Ten Out Of Ten’ and ‘Windows In The Jungle’ too but they’re even rarer on CD and long overdue a re-issue themselves!) but if you’re a fan who already owns everything else and has still been put off by lackluster reviews: don’t be. This is far from 10cc at their best, but if this is their worst and most ordinary record then – my goodness – that shows up what a wonderful lot the rest of them were. I mean, what other band could release an album featuring songs about plastic surgery, overpopulation, immigration, sex clinics and vampires and still have this as their most boring, generic record? Look, hear, if you don’t already know the ins and outs of this band and this is the sort of thing that ends up being ‘normal’ then I can’t begin to tell you how eccentric, imaginative, daring and original the other nine 10cc records are... Overall rating 4/10

Here is the only one music video from their 1980 album:

It Doesn't Matter At All

How Dare You!

Jan. 1976 (UK#5, US#47)


How Dare You (Creme, Godley)
Lazy Ways (Creme, Stewart)
I Wanna Rule The World (Creme, Godley, Gouldman)
I'm Mandy Fly Me (Stewart, Gouldman, Creme)
Iceberg (Gouldman, Godley)
Art For Art's Sake (Stewart, Gouldman)
Rock'n'Roll Lullaby (Gouldman, Stewart)
Head Room (Godley, Creme)
Don't Hang Up (Godley, Creme)


CREDITS
How Dare You
Eric: Steel Guitar, Lead Guitar
Kevin: Drums, Congas, Cow Bell, Bongos
Graham: Bass, Rizo-Rizo
Lol: Rhythm Guitar, 12 String, Lead Guitar, Clavinet, Moog, Maracas, Sleigh Bells
Lazy Ways
Eric: Lead Vocal, Lead Guitar, 6 String Bass
Graham: Acoustic Guitars, Tambourine, Backup Vocals
Lol: Piano, Clavinet, Moog, Tambourine, Backup Vocals
Kevin: Drums, Triangle, Backup Vocals
I Wanna Rule The World
Lol: Organ, Piano, Backup Vocals,
Kevin: Drums, Timpani, Maracus, Backup Vocals
Eric: Lead Guitar, Backup Vocals
Graham: Bass, Backup vocals
I'm Mandy Fly Me
Eric: Lead Vocal, Lead Guitar, Electric & Acoustic Piano, Whistle, Backup Vocals
Graham: Bass, Zithers, Double Bass, 6 String Bass, Backup Vocals
Kevin: Drums, Backup Vocals
Lol: Lead Guitar, Moog, Vibes, Backup Vocals
Iceberg
Graham: Lead Vocal, Lead Guitar, Bass, Backup Vocals
Kevin: 2nd Lead Vocal, Congas, Timpani, Backup Vocals
Eric: Lead Guitar, Levi Zip
Lol: Organ, Gizmo, Backup Vocals
Art For Art's Sake
Eric: Lead vocal, Piano, Electric Piano, 6 String Bass, Fazz Bass, Lead Guitar
Graham: 3rd Lead Vocal, Electric Guitar, Cow Bell, Tambourine, Backup Vocals
Lol: 2nd Lead Vocal. Electric Guitar, Maracus, Moog, Recorder, Backup Vocal
Kevin: Drums Temple, Blocks, Backup Vocals
Rock'n'Roll Lullaby
Kevin: Lead Vocal, Drums, Backup Vocals
Eric: 2nd Lead Vocal, Lead Guitar, Pedal Steel Guitar, Piano
Lol: Electric Guitar, Backup Vocal
Graham: Bass, Dobro, Slide Guitar, Glockenspiel
Head Room
Lol: Lead vocal, Lead Guitar, Electric piano
Kevin: Drums, Tambourine, Backup Vocals
Graham: Bass, Backup Vocals
Eric: Slide Guitar, Backup Vocal
Don't Hang Up
Kevin: Lead Vocal, Castanets, Hand Claps, Backup Vocals
Lol: Piano, Electric Piano, Maracas, Hand Claps, Backup Vocals, Gizmo, Moog
Graham: Bass, Spanish Guitar, Hand Claps, Backing vocals
Eric: Lead guitar, Backup vocals
Thanks to Mair Jones: Harp


Here's the story behind the album:

Over the years we've seen some interesting comments from Alan's Album Archive bands when an album that an artist has spent months or years working on is finally out in the public eye. John Lennon dismissed his 'Mind Games' album as 'rock and roll at different speeds', Roger Waters declared 'Amused to Death' to be the third part in a holy trinity after 'Dark Side Of The Moon' and 'The Wall' and Neil Young once described 'Harvest' as 'the middle of the road when I was aiming for the ditch!' My favorite though is when bassist Graham Gouldman was asked by a hapless music journalist while making this album what the topics might be this time around: 'Well, it's a strange mixture of songs. There's one about divorce, one about schizophrenia, a song about wanting to rule the world, the inevitable money song - oh and an instrumental!' Actually that's underselling 'How Dare You', easily the most bonkers and the most controversial 10cc record, as you can add to that list a lullaby about childhood where sleep-deprived parents swear at their children, a teenager moving on from masturbation to sex and a soap opera where a mythical figure named Mandy rises from the sea to save a man involved in a plane wreck. You don't get any of those on a Spice Girls album...

'How Dare You' is most famous for being the last album with founding members Kevin Godley and Lol Creme. What's fascinating in retrospect isn't that there was a split (not since CSNY had there been a group with such split personalities) but that it occurs here. You see, even this album - which builds on 'The Original Soundtrack's madcap range of Last Suppers, perverted blackmailers, Parisian prostitutes and minestrone metaphors - isn't enough for them. Despite the fact that 10cc have moved beyond affectionate 1950s pastiches and comic book cutouts to discuss human life in the surrealist possible way in just four short years, 'How Dare You' - the strangest single album of the 1970s so far (with the possible exception of the band's earlier 'Sheet Music') - hasn't gone far enough. Godley and Creme naturally beat this with the mother of all concept albums the first time out (the three-album set 'Consequences', which you need a phd just to follow never mind understand), but calling 'How Dare You'  too conservative an album seems to most fans like calling Lenin too conservative a revolutionary. Let me emphasis if you're new to this album (and especially if you're new to 10cc): this album makes 'Tommy' seem comprehensible, 'The White Album' seem condensed and makes everything Michael Jackson released sound vaguely sane. One minute we're in the head of a friendless psychopath desperate to turn his life around and make people bow down in power; the next we're in the mind of a madman left in a basket on the freeway whose about to break free of his perennial fixed grin; then we're a horny teenager wondering if all the things he isn't allowed to do now will be as fun as he thinks they will be; the next we're being pulled from under by an imaginary angel-come-air-hostess like that film of Dr No, No No No No. In short,  'How Dare You' is nuttier than a squirrel version of Nigel Farage holding a fruitcake. If this album was a person it would be your crazy Uncle Eddie locked up for impersonating a cabbage.

In any other band's hands this would be a stretch too far and even 10cc don't always get the balance of emotion, imagery and emulsion quite right: too much of this album goes for brains and brawn over feelings, a lot of it is too wild for all but the most out-there fans to grasp (not me though: wibble!) and the production gloss means that a lot of what should be cute and wacky cartoons come across sounding like the manga version of 'War and Peace'. 'How Dare You' isn't the perfect 10cc record - for me that's the later post-Godley and Creme works that always get left behind and even with this line-up the peak arguably came on albums two or three ('Sheet Music' or 'Soundtrack'). 'How Dare You' is, however, the most 10cc of 10cc albums; the record where every single track sounds like something this band would do that no other band would even begin to think of - and yet where every single song sounds completely different to the others on the LP. And therein lies the real reason for Godley and Creme to leave: the band couldn't possibly go anywhere quite this wild again without either recycling some of the ideas or getting ever more desperate for ideas. Lol seemed to realize this when talking to the Guardian to plug the band's 'Tenology' box in 2012: this album marks a 'crossroads' - all roads till now have been leaving to it but for the band to stay together it would have to chase it's own tail going back round and round the same path when there are simply too many to follow. A fifth Godley and Creme version of 10cc is an interesting prospect though and one a lot of fans have tried to imagine: would it have been like 'Consequences' (a jump too far for any fans to keep up with?) Like the album Stewart and Gouldman made (The mixed success 'Deceptive Bends'?) Would it have split the band between a 'wild' side and a 'poppy' side? Sadly we'll never know.

What we do know is that 10cc have gone about as far as covering the whole range of life and experience in one album as they can. What a record like this badly needs is something to tie the whole thing together and luckily 10cc are the rock royalty of the half-concept album. Every single song here is about mi-communication in some way, with each misunderstood gesture and underappreciated action fueling the flames of something dangerous. You can hear it on this album when the clearly hurt and sulking killer vows to take his revenge on an unkind universe on 'I Wanna Rule The World!!!' The quiet loony whose calm coping exterior that everyone sees is only part of the 'iceberg' whose waiting for an excuse to erupt. The artist pushed too far in his search for money that he sells out all his artistic ideals, even though that's what an unspeaking fan base clearly want. The teenager whose never been taught about 'love' and only knows the mucky tales he's learnt - and spied on - involving sex; somehow you know this lad is going to end up a teenager father at best, a serial heartbreaker or even a rapist at worst. Most movingly it's heard in 'Don't Hang Up' which, some excruciating 10cc-ish puns aside, is as simple and straightforward a song about heartbreak as the band ever recorded, a phone that's literally about people not listening to each other because the other end never picks up the flipping phone! Even the other songs touch on it; I've been listening to 'Lazy Ways' for decades and yet I've only just noticed how ambiguous it is about whether relaxing and taking it easy is a good or a bad thing; the ambiguity makes it come across as a schizophrenic discussion where both sides have positives and the narrator never comes to a final conclusion. As for that song about miles-high Mandy, everyone else assumes this is the narrator's struggling sub-consciousness talking to him and assuming for the moment that they are right (and let's face it, stranger things have happened, in 10cc songs if not real life) then it suggests another 'self' we don't know is there but is always talking to us. The overall result is much like that for Pink Floyd's later 'Division Bell' (which ends in a similar way, with the band's manager on the phone to a child and having the phone hung up on him) things would be better for us all if we did more talking.

Talking of Pink Floyd, their usual album sleeve artists Hipgnosis did the artwork for 10cc and it's one of their most successful designs, so popular that the team are involved from here-on in in some capacity until 1981. Unusually, both front and inner designs have aged better with time, sounding off about topics that actually make more sense today than they did in 1976. The front and back sleeves feature a 'soap opera' - something that only ever featured housewives, policemen and 'agricultural folk' back in the days before 'Eastenders' and 'Hollyoaks' (perhaps Manchester's premier band of the day were answering to Coronotion Street, the only one to go anywhere close to this story?) The story is broken up into four sections, but without any captions or writing, leaving the listener to 'fill' this in themselves. Bottom left, a businessman is on the phone shouting. Top left a morose housewife is on the phone getting drunk. On the back sleeve a tramp seems to be on a public telephone box calling up a pretty girl in a hotel who looks shocked (she's dressed in an air hostess uniform - could this be Mandy?) At first sight all these telephone calls seem to be connected. But trust 10cc to give us an extra layer: keep your eyes on the periphery for a couple who appear in every single shot. That's them in the photograph on the businessman's desk, pulling up in a car in the housewife's drive, hugging outside the telephone box and appearing on the hotel room TV. Unless they're sets of  quads where all four identical brothers married all four identical sisters or invented a time machine, it's safe to say they can't appear in all four places at once. So what we have here are four different stories involving four different phone-calls with the only common denominator being two people who might be complete strangers to the foursome (well, not the guy who has a picture of them sitting on his desk at least) and who might not even be alive at the same time (that's a very old monochrome shot of them on the TV). Incidentally the couple were friends of Hipgnosis' Aubrey Powell who'd always wanted to feature in some of his art - and amazingly, yes, her name really was 'Mandy'! The result is an album cover that's much like the album - people are talking to each other but from a distance and the wires have somehow got crossed and mixed up. Things are more fun but just as inventive on the inner sleeve. There's a party taking place in a nice looking house (one that Powell thinks, but can't quite remember, might have belonged to one of the Floyd) - only instead of chatting or gossiping face to face everyone is on the phone, wrapped up in their own tiny dramas. Remember, this is a good 20 years before mobile phones that like all modern inventions has become the 'latest menace' to 'fragment civilization' that far from being the 'cause' that so many people blame is simply another symptom of a human trait that goes back long before we had any technology to blame it on. Hipgnosis even provide a 10c version of 'Where's Wally', with all four bandmembers hidden somewhere on the album sleeve, none of them obvious on first glance (we don't want to spoil the fun but if you're having problems guessing that's Godley at the back on the far left, Creme's in the middle with the phone cord wrapped around his neck, Stewart's just right of center at the back in a fetching blue bow tie and Gouldman's just below him in the foreground, reaching out for a cigarette).

Whether by design or accident, then, this album is clearly about the split somewhere in there. High on the list of reasons for bands to split, right above 'spending time with my family' 'taking too many drugs' 'not turning up to rehearsals' and throwing a tangerine at your brother, is 'miscommunication'. Far from the rows that The Who and Oasis have had down the years, 10cc are the masters at awkward silences and of putting up with things for the sake of the band that they secretly don't agree with (that's why the split is the single most 'wow-I-didn't see-that-coming-one of every single AAA band; we all knew the Beach Boys, The Monkees and The Who would end the way they did - and frankly we're secretly rather surprised The Rolling Stones are still going - but 10cc, they should still be going strong now). Secret messages, pent up rages, secret desires to rule the world (or at least the studio) their way: 'How Dare You' seems like a secret glimpse into the band's psyche. Even that title, named after the single line spoken in the title song, sounds less like the subtle warning about the controversies of sex and swearing at toddlers it was presumably there for and more like a secret feeling that people are stepping on your toes. An eruption was inevitable; the fact that Godley and Creme were desperate to develop their 'gizmo' (which bended the notes of guitar strings and became an industry standard - that's not lazy research by the way, they really did call it that!) and Stewart and Gouldman wanted to stick to what the band had always been doing was the trigger but wasn't the sole cause. As a result 'How Dare You' is one of those albums, a bit like 'Abbey Road' and Oasis' 'Dig Out Your Soul' that have now taken on quite a different feeling to the one they had at the time: at the time it felt like fun as usual and it was good to see them back in any form; now it just feels like a long goodbye. The album even ends with a telephone being hung up, heard mid-note just before a 'natural' break was about to occur. If the band weren't playing with fans' minds then they should have second careers as soothsayers ('Ah yes...I see your life floating past my crystal ball...yours will turn out like...a minestrone served with parmesean cheese!')

That said, 10cc notably continue their usual policy of 'musical writing chairs', swapping partners so that each of the six possible combinations (Godley-Creme, Godley-Gouldman, Godley-Stewart, Creme-Gouldman, Creme-Stewart, Gouldman-Stewart) gets a go together somewhere, something we wish more bands who have more than two writers in them would do (the Mike Nesmith-Peter Tork Monkees combination has never been exploited; nor has the Phil Lesh-Bob Weir Grateful Dead one). That's a terrific strength to have, effectively giving us six different bands in one (heck, Godley and Creme were at least five different bands when they were together so make that ten). It's this variety, more than anything else, that will prevent both sides of 10cc from being anything like as great separately as they were apart (although both of them will give it a blooming good go, on albums like 'Windows In The Jungle' and 'Freeze Frame' particularly).
Ironically it's that variety, that need to go anywhere and everywhere, that hurts this album most. In case you hadn't guessed by now, I love my albums to be weird. Any record that gives me something nothing else I own has ever given me is always going to be special, whether it's high-voltage feedback, songs about singing toasters or china cat sunflowers. However even I'm shouting in frustration by the end of this record, which is so utterly, totally different each and every time that your head is spinning by the end. Every other 10cc album thus far has had some moments of normality to calm things down; an 'I'm Not In Love' to segue between the streets of Paris and the wronged lover appearing as a center-fold in 'Playboy' or the 'Old Wild Men' who sweep in serenely in-between a Hotel run by cannibals and tick-a-tick-a time bombs about to go off on a jet plane. The closest we get here to a 'normal', run of the mill pop song is 'Art For Art's Sake' and even that's got dressed up to the nines production-wise to the point where it now sounds like an art noir film shot in technicolor. Normally Eric and Graham are our grounding to earth but, whether in an attempt to keep up with an unhappy Godley and Creme or because their writing was genuinely heading this way anyway, they're as 'weird' as their colleagues, giving us a lullaby for a sleeping baby that's anything but family-friendly and an air-hostess giving a man the kiss of life even though she couldn't possibly exist. By the way, you also know that you've probably gone past any limit on what can possibly be 'normal' when that latter song is released as a single and held up to be one of the reasons the band is getting too 'restrictive' so you have to leave, then that is a band that's clearly gone too far.

All that said, there's much to enjoy about this album. This album might wear you out by going to so many places all at once, but most of the places are worth a look. 'Lazy Ways' is an overlooked example of what Pink Floyd fans would call a 'pastoral' work - a rare glimpse at the trees and the nature and the summer from what is generally one of rock music's most urban of bands. 'I Wanna Rule The World' and 'Iceberg' are both funnier and more out there than anything by the more celebrated Frank Zappa. 'Rock and Roll Lullaby' and 'Headroom' are genuinely 10cc at their funniest, with some great lines on subjects that you'll never ever hear again on any other album. 'Don't Hang Up' is 10cc at their most humane, recycling the feel of 'Somewhere In Hollywood' but using the laughs more sparingly, as little jokes between a couple who clearly know each other well rather than as the punchline for something clever. Unusually this album's singles are the two weakest links (along with the one and only 10cc instrumental (editor's note: oops forgot about B-side 'Gizmo My Way' - alright then, the one and only 10cc instrumental that made an album!), which sounds odd right at the start of the album) but even they only pall compared to what came before - 10cc simply have simply gone so far ahead of their old selves that the band are effectively forced into releasing the only two songs that still have anything even vaguely in common with the pop charts and aren't necessarily picked because they're the best songs in the bunch (interestingly both halves of the band rectify this problem quickly - Stewart and Gouldman with the catchy but deep 'The Things We Do For Love' and Godley and Creme with the lovely yearning '5 O'Clock In The Morning'). Best of all, this album feels like a progression the sort of things we keep nagging our bands for not making: the themes are deeper (usually), the stakes are higher (generally) and far from selling out like at least one half of the band feared this record is still very much 'art for art's sake', the band breaking up when music was still a career, not merely a living. We might not like every lesson 'How Dare You' has to tell us. We might not like the backdrop to every story it presents to us. We might not enjoy it as much as some of the earlier slightly less zany works (or in my case some of the later, less zany works) but we admire this album's world of broken relationships and higher consequences (see where Godley and Creme got that idea?) all the same.


How can 10cc possibly follow-up 14 minute musical 'Un Nuit En Paris' as their latest opening track? The short answer is, they don't: the title track of 'How Dare You!' is instead quite light and flimsy in 10cc terms. In fact, it's the only time the band make good on the promise shown in their 'Hotlegs' recording 'Neanderthal Man' and go for unusual, rhythm-heavy sounds as opposed to melody, lyrics or puns. On the plus side there's an awful lot going on in this instrumental, which features every possible percussion instrument known to man (cowbells, congas, bongos, maracas, sleigh bells and even something called a 'rizo-rizo' for which I can find no reference whatsoever in anything else; type into google and all you get is the credits for this song, a load of guys with that name and Rizo the Rat from The Muppets). The song starts off as slow and laid-back but turns into a more turbulent song by the second half when we slide to a minor key and end up in the hands of a harpsichord, before the song awkwardly rights itself and launched itself into a more usual guitar track. This song, like 'Neanderthal Man', makes more sense when you realize how obsessed with engineering 10cc all were: the band were formed to run Strawberry Studios for other musicians and Eric especially became a very fine engineer, interested in the 'practical' side of music-making; these two songs represent perhaps the most extreme examples of a song being created solely for the purposes of creating a 'sound'. Usually instrumentals don't have a theme, they just kind of roll around a bit, but as you'd expect 10cc seem to have a few idea for what's going on in this song and leave a few clues: it starts with the voice of 10cc secretary Kathy Warren whispering 'quiet!' and then 'How dare you!' which gives the effect of a romantic liaison gone wrong (seeing as Kathy was also the voice in the middle of 'I'm Not In Love' whispering 'big boys don't cry', is this later on in the same relationship?) The highlight is Eric's howling guitar which finally takes off somewhere around 90 seconds into the song and some more playing around with vocals (a 'Mexican cheer' and fed into the song backwards down the left channel). The result is one last great gasp of pure musicianship from a band on its last creative legs, giving everyone a chance to shine in turn. Interestingly, the song is credited to Godley and Creme alone although all four members seem to have been quite involved in shaping it.

'Lazy Ways' is a collaboration between Creme and Stewart that again sounds rather bare and basic by 10cc standards, the kind of laid-back folk-rock about having a good lazy time we expect most bands to record at some point but not the usually workaholics 10cc. However that's only the first half of the melody, built on a sweet piano lick; the rest of the song builds up layer and layer to the point where an angry mellotron growls in the background and we get the repetitive relentless sound of what sounds like a tambourine being thrown and caught from one member of the band to another, whizzing past our ears like a relentless factory conveyor-belt. The rest of the song then becomes a dialogue between the two, trying to find the answer to the question 'how can you work and yet avoid getting out of your lazy ways?' The lyrics then get confused, the chorus ('You'll never get up if you don't get up...') sounding as if its come from another song entirely (my guess is the laid-back start is Creme's and the punchier restless middle is by Stewart, simply based on the previous styles we've heard from the pair down the years). A romantic middle eight (with the curious line 'Holding you, with your body') confuses matters more: is the word 'endlessly' meant to mean that the narrator has to keep interrupting his love life to earn a living? The result is a second straight song that seems to be more about sound and texture than the words, but another strong group performance (with Eric's vocal particularly fine) and a lovely see-sawing melody mean the band just about get away with it.

'I Wanna Rule The World!!!' (by Godley, Creme and Gouldman) is much more like the real 10cc and is a sound collage unlike any other you'll ever hear. A whole group of frightening Graham Gouldmans march into the room on both sides before making way for Creme's nerdy narrator, tired of being bossed around and with a future with nothing more exciting than working in 'daddy's shop'. Godley's wicked mock-angelic voice then acts as his conscience egging him on: 'whatcha gonna do? How ya gonna do it?' Another terrific very 50s guitar solo then links to another James Bondy section through the eyes of the baddie willing for success ('I'm keeping them on ice, in suspended animation..') A call to a rally then gives way to what this song's really about: tired of being bullied, the narrator wants to be the bully. Creme yells his next lines at the top of his voice and turns the song into a demented Nazi rally (Pink Floyd should have hired him for the role of Pink in 'The Wall' film; he's twice as demented but three times more convincing in the role than Bob Geldof on 'In The Flesh?') Creme's playful childlike voice then withdraws, tells us that he wants everyone to be free - but, power going to his head again, he wants the world to 'be less free than me because I rule the world you see'. The scene is then pulled back to reveal the narrator for what he is: a scared child sending out an army of teddy bears and dolls out to wreak revenge, the only strings he has under him to pull. The result is a song that, even by 10cc standards, pulls away the rug from under us every time we think we're getting close to the 'truth' and one that we're forever having to re-asses based on our assessment of the narrator: when we think he's an evil demi-God we're angry; when we know he's a child venting his frustrations at his helplessness we're on his side (note the reference to 'getting a pain in the Shirley Temples', an early hint at the childlike status of the narrator). A production masterclass, 'I Wanna Rule The World!!!' is exquisitely constructed, with several different performances stapled together in a way that must have taken an awful lot of hard work. I'm still not sure whether all that hard work is really worth it - as a production number with the clever twist at the end 'World' is a song made to admire, but a song to actually enjoy? I'm not so sure...

'I'm Mandy, Fly Me' by Eric, Graham and Lol begins with the hook-line from 'Clockwork Creep' (on second album 'Sheet Music') and an airplane flying overhead before being swiped aside by a fat bass line, exotic synthesizer sound effects, a vocoder apparently whispering 'amazing grace' and whistling. We find out later that the airplane has crash-landed in the water, with the narrator thrown out of the plane (his first line is that he's 'on the outside looking in') but rather than sound petrified or angry, the narrator bobbing in the water is ecstatic. The poster he sees on the side of the aircraft, of an air-hostess named Mandy, 'with a smile as bright as sunshine' causes him to hallucinate (or so it seems) and takes him out of himself ('The world was spinning like a ball, and then it wasn't there at all!') Mandy gives him the 'kiss of life' that saves him, his addled brain setting off on a journey of exotic acoustic guitars and psychedelic effects that ends only when he's pulled from the wreckage; he asks for Mandy but she's not there. A love song to an imaginary person, created by a situation so intense and extreme that the 'real essence' of life comes into sharp contrast, 'Mandy' is balancing a lot of things for a humble catchy single. For a start we don't know who to believe: the narrator is clearly awake enough to realize that what's happening to him seems like a film (Mandy acts 'just like the girl in Dr No, no no no') and yet when he tells his rescuers later that it might have all been in his head they tell him 'no no no no' and that she was was real, yet currently missing - do they mean this? Or is that simply a ruse to keep him awake and conscious in the hope that the pair might be reunited? (note the sheer amount of denies in each of those two lines, the sort of things you do when you're lying to someone). The key line of this song is 'if your chance would you take it?' - would you be prepared to create a whole new life for yourself in your mind to keep yourself alive? And if you did, what would happen to you afterwards when you realized you were making it all up? It's interesting in this context that the band chose an 'air hostess' as their 'exotic woman' (the first in a whole sequence of imaginary confident Eric Stewart girls who'll end up seducing him on subways and all sorts in albums to come): air hostesses never seem quite real anyway, what with all that make-up and being made up to look the same. This clearly isn't a 'real' woman: she's the sort you see everywhere if you travel by plane a lot and even that name - Mandy - isn't a common one amongst 'real' people, though it's used a lot in books. The result is a fourth straight song in a row that's easy to admire and yet there's something difficult to fall in love with compared to earlier classic 10cc singles: there's too many questions and not enough answers for this to be an 'easy ride', with the sudden switch of gears every time the band break out for another instrumental making this song less easy on the ears than, say, 'I'm Not In Love' or 'Rubber Bullets'. Still, this is a lot of people's favorite 10cc song for a reason: its a love song told with such a radical twist that no one on first hearing could have heard it coming (if they'd understood it at all), traditionally loved by 'true' fans (although interestingly co-writer Lol Creme wasn't one of them; it was this song he quoted as evidence that the band were growing stale). In actuality 'Mandy' is a clever hybrid of catchy commercialism and bonkers uniqueness that couldn't possibly have been thought up by another band, but there are better mixtures of the same ingredients around, even on this same album.

'Iceberg' is a roller coaster that we all ride if we own this album, a Godley-Gouldman collaboration that takes weird to new levels. Musically this is a return to the 'Donna' and 'Sacro-Illiac' 50s spoofing 10cc of the first two albums, but featuring more switches of pace, mood and feel in its 3:45 running time than most 1950s albums. Musically this is a jolly song with a sing-songy narrator, but that's just the tip of the iceberg: what the lyrics (delivered by both writers in their sweetest voices) tell us is something quite different. The narrator is an orphan whose been 'in and out of trouble ever since they left me in a basket on the freeway' and whose background haunts him badly, even though most people don't realize on meeting him. If you do something to 'annoy' him, he can't handle it ('I might do something you might regret in a hurry...'), a line spoken in the same cool casual manner so that you probably miss it the first time round. Later verses tell us that some people believe he belongs in a 'home for crazy people' and that his hobby is 'heavy breathing on the telephone'. But these moments aren't 'usual' - they're the bottom of the iceberg society has tried to pretend isn't there and that the narrator's cruel family-less background has been 'solved' by a few kind words and a pat on the head. So what do we do? As the song says 'there ain't a thing that you can do': society is locked in this stalemate until someone gets hurt, which by the sound of it happens at the end of the song, a truly eerie mesh of distorted voices, cackling 'ha ha ha' laughter and the narrator sweetly telling us to 'get down - 'cause there's not a thing that you can do' and the threat that he might 'be back' later. The very end of the song finds us back at the end, with a roller coaster that no longer seems so fun and the electronically distorted snorting of a pig. The fight between animal and human within the narrator has been lost, with the former apparently winning. Another odd song, 'Iceberg' is another piece that just about gets away with the difficult brief of letting us 'understand' a difficult to sympathize with narrator and seeing life fully from his perspective, with no guilt no doubt and no change in his feelings as he commits his terrible deeds. There are some clever ideas and some excellent couplets (best line: 'It's me that's been dogging your shadow, it's me that's been shadowing your dog') but, again, 'Iceberg' isn't the sort of track you put on for enjoyable listening; there's only so much thinking you can do listening to an album and this track alone stretches the listener a little too far I feel, even without the context of being track five on a nine track album which all demand you do the same.

By contrast, 'Art For Art's Sake' is probably the 'emptiest' song 10cc ever released as a single. A scathing extension of 'The Wall Street Shuffle' by the same writers (Stewart and Gouldman) it features a cold and heartless riff, chilling sound effects and sarcastic lyrics about the twin competing desires of all artists everywhere who need 'art for art's sake but money for god's sake'. It's as if 10cc have deliberately come up with a catchy singalong that merely repeats the central idea in different ways to deliberately exploit this loophole and include the audience as part of the constraints: to continue to make their less accessible songs  the band also have to make songs like this from time to time and writing a song about that process is either deeply cynical or a marvelous post-modern statement about the state of the art world (notice this song is widened to include all 'art', not just music) that criticizes the fact that singles like this have to get released. To be fair, 10cc always give us value for money with their productions and this is one of their best: Eric provides another terrific vocal with cameos from Lol at his highest and Graham at his deepest. There's another terrific Guitar solo which (unlike the single version) plays on and on for a full minute at the fade, with Eric's part perfectly judged between genuine enjoyment and freedom and the cyncism of the rest of the song. Best of all is the use of sound effects which beat anything Pink Floyd did on 'Money' by being less literal and more inventive, with ringing tills and clattering percussion signifying the sound of coins. Again, while this is simple stuff lyrically with less meat on the bones than any 10cc song since the first album, musically this is another complex piece and you never quite know where you're going, with ideas whizzing past you at high speed. That lot ends up with another song that sounds more fun to make than it is to listen to, but even comparatively empty 10cc has more going on than most bands would ever think to include and there's a nicely gutsy, rocky vibe at the heart of this track which makes a change from the run of ballads that were being released as singles. The song's writers seem to have liked it as they basically recycle the idea and sound for the similar 'Good Morning Judge', their first single post-split.

The sweet 'Rock and Roll Lullaby' comes next, another Stewart-Gouldman song sung by Kevin. The song is the best used yet of the 'what did he just sing?' technique the band have been perfecting across two albums now, with a tired dad singing to his toddler in the same universal sing-songy voices used by parents everywhere but realizing that  as the youngster doesn't understand the words and just the tone of voice he can get away with all sorts of language ('It's daybreak in the land of nod, so get to sleep you little sod!') Godley's innocent vocals are the perfect match for this song with a twist and it's easy to sympathize with the tired narrator as he tried to get his child to grow up and become more independent and then instantly regrets it, realizing that childhood is too short as it is. The song cops out by the end, with the admission that he or she (we never find out which) will be loved 'anyway you are', the cue for a big singalong, but even that's somehow fitting in a song that's clearly about a loving if infuriating relationship, the narrator quick to recognize that their 'devil' might yet turn into an 'angel', unable to 'reason what is right and what is wrong'. In this context though, the line 'the sandman's gonna get you!' seems a bit harsh. The end result is a sweet little song that will be identified with by parents of young children everywhere and perfectly in keeping with the album theme of 'mis-communication' and hidden messages.

'How Dare You' then ends with the last two songs Godley-Creme made with the band. 'Head Room' is sung by Lol and finds the pair in mischievous mood, pushing the limits of what was allowed under censorship in 1976. We're never told just how old the narrator of this song is but he's clearly young and curious about the world of sex that's all around him but which he's not 'allowed' to join in with. He's remarkably aware of what's going on around him, 'hanging around' when his parents aren't looking and getting intimate, making the birds and bees go 'weak at the knees' from 'practice' and dreaming of his first kiss. Most of the song is bouncy and jolly, the kind of thing they use as theme tunes for cartoons about naughty schoolkids in the UK (take your pick out of Just William, Dennis The Menace and Tracy Beaker depending on your age) with a country-rock feel thanks to some steel gizmoed guitar. Thankfully 10cc vary this sound (which would have become irritating really really quickly) with some touches of real pathos: the moment when the band stop 'playing' and get emotional in full harmony on the line 'Oo they've been shooting me a line, maybe it doesn't exist at all' is the most thrilling moment on the whole album, making a silly song sound 'real' in the space of a few seconds. Less forgivable, though, are some excruciating puns: the title is the closest the band can get away in the mid-70s to the idea of the narrator being given 'head' and the line that he's up late because 'it's far too wet to woo' that makes him sound like an owl is so bad it's painful! Head Room' might not be the best Godley-Creme song ever written but it's a lot of fun and features exactly the sort of playfulness I wish their duo records had featured more of.

The album then ends with its best song, 'Don't Hang Up'. Godley's vocals and Lol's sad piano melody are the sound of heartbreak on a sad tale of a couple breaking up when one half doesn't want them to. The lines are very clever and like 'I'm Not In Love' tell the listener more about the narrator through subterfuge than he would ever have told us outright: he protests that he's doing 'really well' but let's slip that his new apartment is 'as safe as Central Park' (which, even in the days before John Lennon's murder nearby four years later, isn't exactly safe). This isn't just comedy though, there's a real pathos here too: the line that the narrator was never the 'Errol Flynn' type his partner longed for despite trying is one of the sweetest in the 10cc pantheon. Along the way the narrator reflects on where it went wrong, recounting an awful honeymoon ('a honeymoon on itchy bedding...dumb waiters waiting, sweating straining, all mass-debating my woman'; notice the typical double entendre in the last line which amounts to the same idea of betrayal and two-timing going on whether you're hearing it or rewarding it from the lyric sheet).In perhaps the greatest moment of the song, even the dustbin men walk into the room to give us their opinion (graham cameo-ing on the song) - even they know it's a 'dustbin romance' that is never going to work; and yet the narrator still hopes that it will. We then follow Godley as he gets drunk and morose (memorably watching vol-au-vents 'explode' at a party while 'lousy violins begin to play)'; a scene made more darkly comic with the knowledge that this might be the 'party' on the album's inner sleeve, where everyone is on the phone trying to speak to their own missing partners. He then heads for the bar with the typical stream of Godley-Creme puns that ends with the narrator imagining the pair winning the 'no noble prize' and misunderstanding the barman's query over a drink, replying 'marriage - on the rocks'. Throughout it all Godley's narrator is on the telephone vainly trying to get his old partner to pick up the phone - but we all know and he secretly knows that she never will, that this relationship is over. One of the best 10cc songs in terms of balancing the chuckles with real feelings, 'Don't Hang Up' is tremendously moving, the cleverness there to move the plot along as well as make us giggle, the humor used as a disguise for tears. The song also marks the perfect end to an album all about people not saying what they really mean: the final note of the album (which in the days of vinyl kept going in the run-out grooves until you lifted the needle off the record) is the 'cancelled' dialing tone of a phone. The song also makes, knowingly or not, for a fine farewell to the 'Godley-Creme' years: this is a song about people going their separate ways and no matter how many people wish however hard, the characters in it are never going to get back together again. Despite being dominated by Godley and Creme, this song also features another fine band performance both musically and vocally, showing all the more reason why the band should have continued and not 'hung up' on their career when they were arguably reaching a peak, of sorts. All bands should split after releasing a song like this: a sort of unified piece about fragmentation that beats better known examples ('The Beatles' 'Abbey Road Medley' and Simon and Garfunkel's 'Song For The Asking') hands down.

Overall, then, 'How Dare You!' isn't the greatest 10cc album ever made but each track is inventive, special and full of a varyingly successful mixture of art for art's sake material that no other band would ever have done. At times this album is a wise old figure delivering the secrets of life; at other times its an annoying toddler tugging at our sleeves for our attention. That's one heck of a lot of ground for one album to cover and 'How Dare You' isn't the sort of album you put on for a bit of light relaxation and a few good tunes. No wonder this album is titled 'How Dare You!' - this record takes more liberties than most: it surrounds us with madmen, psychopaths and hallucinations, bounces between out and out comedy and earnestness and after dangling this carrot of inventiveness and originality before our ears snatches it away by telling us there won't be any more, even though we've spent a great deal of time twisting our brains around to make this album fit into our understanding of how albums work.  If you want an album that makes you think and make you laugh, that takes you somewhere you will never ever go again, however, then you're more likely to say 'I love you' than 'how dare you'! Overall rating - 6/10


Here are those music videos from that 1976 album:

Art for Art's Sake

I'm Mandy Fly Me